white-logo-01
complete list of non extradition countries in 2025

Blogs January 22, 2025 24 Min

Non-Extradition Countries: Complete List & Guide 2025

More than one in three adults in the United States has faced the criminal justice system and on average, 1.9 million people are held in various correctional facilities in the country. These numbers are huge, and can bring frustration, especially for those who believe they’ve been treated unfairly or fear severe penalties. And in these cases, for some, looking into non-extradition countries appears to be a pretty possible lifeline. In this blog, we’ll examine what it means to relocate to countries, where formal handover agreements with the US are limited or non-existent. We’ll also explore how certain locations have principles that prevent forced return when fundamental rights may be at risk. This discussion is to understand the legal structures, human rights protections, and the steps individuals might take to preserve basic dignity and well-being. What Are Non-Extradition Countries Extradition involves sending a person from one state to another where they face accusations or sentencing. It typically comes into play when someone flees their home jurisdiction, hoping to avoid legal consequences. If the two countries are bound by an official arrangement, authorities often cooperate to carry out the transfer. Non-Extradition countries Definition Non-extradition countries are those that do not engage in the practice of extraditing their own citizens to other countries. Such countries usually have laws, banning the extradition of their nationals, or they have yet to establish extradition treaties with other nations. Legal Framework Most extradition procedures rely on treaties. These agreements specify which criminal offences qualify, outline the legal process, and detail the rights of the person in question. When such a contract does not exist, there is no built-in system to facilitate surrender. That said, local authorities may resort to deportation or special bilateral pacts to manage cases that attract strong attention. When questions of human rights arise, such as possible inhumane treatment, the host country might deny extradition regardless of other factors. This is where non-refoulement comes into play, a policy aimed at preventing forced return to a location where an individual’s safety or dignity is under threat. International Relations Aspect Whether or not a country enters into an extradition treaty also depends on diplomacy, trade alliances, and historic ties. Some governments favour non-extradition stances to stay neutral on global issues or avoid possible interference with their legal independence. Others sign treaties to reinforce partnerships, advance broader security aims, or address significant transnational crimes. Shifts in political climate can quickly change a country’s position, so keeping track of these developments is crucial if someone needs clarity about how a nation might handle a US request for extradition. Understanding Extradition Treaties and Safe Haven Countries The mechanics of extradition vary depending on the legal frameworks in place and the nature of agreements between the nations involved. How Extradition Works When the United States seeks to bring someone to face charges, officials initiate the process by submitting a formal request to the foreign government where that individual is believed to be residing. The local judicial system reviews the request to determine if the alleged act is regarded as a crime under the local laws and whether existing agreements support the surrender of the suspect. If the crime in question fits within the bounds set by the treaty, and the local legal system confirms that all criteria are met, authorities may then move forward with turning the person over to US custody. For example, if a suspect involved in money laundering flees to a nation with a treaty covering financial crimes, that nation may find sufficient legal grounds to process the extradition request. In contrast, if a person is in a country with no binding agreement with the United States, the legal route can be significantly more complex or even entirely blocked unless alternative methods are employed. Types of Treaties for Extradition Bilateral Agreements Bilateral treaties are the most common form of arrangement. In such cases, two countries agree directly to terms which include transferring individuals suspected or convicted of crimes. Each country pledges to comply with the procedures defined in the treaty, making sure that if a criminal matter arises, both sides are legally obliged to follow through with the process. For instance, many European countries maintain bilateral treaties with the US covering a broad range of crimes, making extradition procedures straightforward under the defined conditions. Multilateral Agreements In contrast, multilateral treaties involve more than two countries coming together under a single agreement. These pacts are designed to address global issues such as terrorism, organized crime, or financial misconduct. Rather than relying on a direct relationship, all member states agree to collaborate and streamline extradition requests among themselves. An example is the framework used by some international anti-terrorism conventions where multiple states commit to mutual legal assistance. Even if a country does not have a specific bilateral treaty with the US, it could still participate in extradition efforts under a multilateral framework. Bilateral vs. Multilateral Agreements Bilateral treaties emphasise direct commitments between two nations. This clarity can simplify the legal processes for handing over an individual, as the involved parties have mutually agreed on the terms and conditions. On the other hand, multilateral pacts underscore collective responsibility. A country considered a safe haven in a bilateral context might still find itself obligated to act under a multilateral arrangement if the request comes from within that broader network. For example, consider a hypothetical situation in which a crime crosses borders—like cyber fraud affecting multiple countries. Nations in a multilateral alliance might coordinate to ensure that the suspect is extradited, even if one of those countries does not have a direct bilateral treaty with every other member. This means that even places reputed to be non-extradition zones can end up cooperating based on a shared international commitment. Complete List of Countries Without US Extradition Treaties The countries below are frequently mentioned as having no formal extradition treaty with the United States. However, policies can change with new treaties, negotiations, or shifts in diplomatic relations. So, it's important to always verify recent developments before drawing conclusions. African Non-Extradition Countries Eritrea Eritrea has no established extradition treaty with the United States. The country’s legal system allows for deportation of non-citizens, but there is no obligation to return individuals requested by US authorities. Eritrea’s cautious approach to international legal cooperation stems from its historical isolation and distinctive political environment. Somalia In Somalia, political instability and ongoing conflict have shaped an approach that does not rely on a formal extradition treaty with the United States. Although Somali law permits deportation in certain cases, the absence of structured judicial cooperation means that each request is managed individually. The fluid situation often leads to unpredictable outcomes in matters of international legal assistance. Asian Non-Extradition Countries China China does not have a conventional extradition agreement with the United States. Instead, cases involving US requests are typically handled through administrative channels such as deportation procedures. The decision-making process can vary according to the details of each case and current diplomatic relations, reflecting China’s emphasis on internal legal control over international judicial matters. Vietnam Vietnam does not maintain an ongoing extradition treaty with the United States. While the nation may address individual cases through temporary or case-specific arrangements, there is no overarching legal obligation to transfer individuals. The handling of such cases depends on the specific nature of the offence and the legal interests at stake. Nepal Nepal’s legal system does not include a direct extradition treaty with the United States. When dealing with criminal matters involving US authorities, local courts and administrative bodies use alternative procedures, often relying on deportation policies. This case-by-case approach means that decisions can vary significantly based on local judicial practices. European Non-Extradition Countries Belarus Belarus does not have a formal extradition treaty with the United States. Its legal framework, influenced by domestic political priorities and historical ties, results in the absence of a structured process for transferring individuals. While international requests may be addressed through other legal or diplomatic channels, there is no standard procedure for extradition in place. Middle Eastern Countries Without Extradition Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia lacks a direct extradition treaty with the United States. Instead, matters involving criminal suspects are evaluated under national laws and handled through mutual legal assistance agreements when necessary. Decisions are made on an individual basis, taking into account both local legal traditions and the specifics of the case. Kuwait Kuwait similarly does not operate under a formal extradition arrangement with the United States. However, the country has established protocols for cooperating on criminal investigations via mutual legal assistance. Each case is approached according to its unique circumstances, often involving internal assessments rather than strict treaty obligations. Pacific Island Nations Without Extradition Vanuatu Vanuatu operates without a formal extradition treaty with the United States. While its legal system does not impose a treaty-based duty to surrender individuals, local authorities may still use domestic laws to address serious criminal matters. This practice reflects Vanuatu’s broader policy of limited engagement in international legal transfers. Samoa Samoa does not have a structured extradition agreement with the United States. The small jurisdiction handles requests on an informal, case-specific basis. Local judicial decisions can be influenced by current political conditions and domestic law, resulting in an approach that treats each situation individually rather than following a predetermined procedure. Top 10 Non-Extradition Countries for Second Citizenship In case you’re exploring alternative paths for second citizenship or simply considering a Plan B, having a backup option can bring extra confidence and flexibility to your international lifestyle. Whether you’re seeking a new residence or additional travel freedom, these ten countries provide appealing citizenship options, complete with established investment programs and practical benefits. Below is an engaging overview of each destination, along with tips and insights on how to apply. Dominica Dominica is recognized for its straightforward citizenship by investment program. Prospective applicants can benefit from a process designed to be clear and efficient. Although Dominica has a mutual legal assistance treaty with the United States, there is no formal extradition commitment. This means US authorities typically collaborate through informal channels rather than invoking a structured extradition process. Vanuatu Vanuatu stands out for its absence of a formal extradition treaty with the United States, which makes it an attractive option for those interested in obtaining a second passport. The country’s citizenship by investment initiative is known for a quick, efficient process that many find appealing. Keep in mind that while legal frameworks currently favour non-extradition, staying informed about any policy shifts is essential. St. Kitts and Nevis The twin-island nation of St. Kitts and Nevis offers a well-established economic citizenship program, popular for its clearly defined application process and competitive financial requirements. Although there is no formal extradition treaty with the United States, there are instances where local authorities have collaborated with US law enforcement on a case-by-case basis for serious crimes. Maldives The Maldives, known for its picturesque scenery and thriving tourism, has no standard extradition treaty with the United States. This arrangement offers an extra layer of legal insulation for those interested in acquiring a second passport. However, local authorities do have mechanisms to respond to Interpol notices in serious cases, so careful consideration is advised. Tip: When considering the Maldives, research local legal nuances and their application on international requests, ensuring that you are up to date with any operational changes that might affect your long-term residence status. Montenegro Montenegro’s position is unique as it sometimes negotiates its legal ties with international partners on individual cases. Although it occasionally falls outside typical extradition obligations with the United States, ongoing efforts for European integration could influence its legal landscape in the future. Tip: If you’re considering Montenegro, monitor legal updates and reforms closely, as evolving policies could affect both your investment and your international mobility over time. Turkey Turkey’s legal system is characterized by specialized protocols, especially for sensitive cases like terrorism or major criminal activities. While it does not have a comprehensive extradition treaty with the United States, its arrangements for serious offences are clearly defined. This gives Turkey a distinctive appeal for those looking to secure a second citizenship that accommodates unique legal scenarios. Jordan Jordan is notable in the Middle Eastern region for not having a standing extradition treaty with the United States, making it a viable option for individuals seeking alternative citizenship. Despite the lack of a formal treaty, high-priority criminal cases may still attract diplomatic discussions. Tip: If Jordan appeals to you, it is wise to verify current legal practices and any recent changes that might impact your application. Staying in contact with legal advisors who specialize in the region can provide clarity on evolving protocols. Cambodia Cambodia offers a promising path for those interested in second citizenship through its alternative legal framework. The absence of a formal US extradition treaty means that while deportations on immigration-related grounds may occur, formal extradition procedures are generally not in force. Tip: Before applying, keep abreast of Cambodia’s legal practices by consulting regional experts, ensuring that you are well informed of any adjustments in diplomatic relations that might influence your application process. Mauritius Mauritius is valued for its political stability and business-friendly environment. Although it does not have a documented extradition treaty with the United States, the island nation participates in international legal conventions that sometimes lead to cooperation in criminal matters. Tip: Potential applicants should review the specifics of Mauritius’ citizenship initiatives and understand how international law may intersect with local legislation. Regular consultation with legal professionals can provide updated guidance as policies evolve. Armenia Armenia currently does not maintain a comprehensive extradition treaty with the United States. Its judicial system handles such matters on a case-by-case basis, which can offer flexibility for those seeking a second citizenship with minimal extradition constraints. Tip: Research the current state of Armenian legal processes and available investment programs and speak with regional legal experts to ensure that your application aligns with the latest legal framework. Each of these destinations presents distinct advantages alongside their own legal peculiarities. Should you choose to pursue a second citizenship, continuous research and consultation with professionals will help you navigate the intricacies of international legal arrangements effectively. Enjoy the journey towards broadening your residence options and stay informed to make the most of the benefits these programs have to offer. List of Non-Extradition Countries That Offer Second Citizenship Programs Below is a table outlining the top non-extradition countries for second citizenship, along with an estimated timeline for obtaining citizenship and a brief note on a key benefit or program characteristic. Legal Considerations When Choosing Non-Extradition Countries International law requires careful thought, especially when considering locations often labelled as “countries without extradition” or “safe countries without extradition.” These terms can be misleading, and it is important to evaluate several aspects before making any decisions. Here are some key considerations: Treaty Gaps Even without an official extradition treaty, many nations may still take action to remove individuals under different legal provisions. For instance, some countries may use deportation laws as an alternative to a lengthy extradition process. Simply having no formal extradition agreement does not automatically eliminate legal risks; local governments might choose other mechanisms to address cases that attract their attention. Local Legal Systems The local judiciary and law enforcement practices can have a major impact on how extradition-related matters are handled. Understanding the structure and decision-making process within a country’s courts, the procedures followed by its police, and the details of its immigration laws is crucial. For example, if a country allows its authorities to make unilateral decisions about foreign nationals suspected of crimes, a person could be handed over to US officials quickly—even in the absence of a formal treaty. Financial Regulations Nations without an extradition treaty may still maintain comprehensive financial oversight. Many of these countries actively monitor financial transactions to prevent money laundering and other financial crimes. Any attempt to hide or move funds could alert authorities and lead to cooperation with foreign governments, despite the absence of a formal extradition procedure. Staying within the boundaries of local financial regulations is as important as understanding the legal aspects of extradition. Geopolitical Environment The political climate in any nation can shift over time. A country that currently refuses formal requests from the United States might change its policy if its diplomatic relations improve or if global political alliances shift. Such changes could alter a nation’s willingness to accept extradition requests, meaning that the legal status of non-extradition countries might not be permanent. For example, if new economic or security partnerships develop, a previously non-cooperative nation may begin to honour extradition requests under certain circumstances. The Value of Professional Guidance Given the complexity of international extradition laws and local legal frameworks, seeking professional legal advice is essential. A legal expert familiar with the nuances of international law can offer precise and up-to-date details, ensuring that anyone considering residence in a non-extradition country is aware of all potential legal risks and obligations. In short, while non-extradition status might seem to offer an appealing alternative for individuals seeking to avoid certain legal proceedings, the reality is far more complex. Each factor, from treaty gaps and local legal customs to strict financial oversight and shifting geopolitical landscapes, plays a critical role in determining whether a haven truly exists. Engaging with knowledgeable legal professionals and staying updated on policy changes are the best steps to ensure that any decision made is fully informed and legally sound. Investment and Citizenship Options in Non-Extradition Countries For those exploring legal residence or a second passport in a non-extradition nation, investment routes can offer a viable pathway. However, while some jurisdictions promote themselves as citizenship by investment safe havens, careful research is essential to fully understand the local regulatory and political landscape. Citizenship by Investment Programs Several Caribbean nations provide programs that allow investors to obtain citizenship in exchange for a significant monetary contribution or real estate purchase. These initiatives have sparked global interest by offering streamlined processes to acquire a second passport. It is important to note, however, that not every country offering these programs is free of extradition arrangements. Investors must confirm that the destination not only offers a straightforward path to citizenship but also maintains a legal framework that aligns with the criteria for non-extradition. Residence Permits Beyond direct citizenship by investment, some countries offer long-term residence permits targeted at investors, retirees, and skilled professionals. In many cases, maintaining resident status over a certain period can eventually lead to eligibility for citizenship. Even in nations lacking formal extradition treaties with the US, these residency pathways are subject to their own set of requirements and regulations. Understanding the local process—how long it takes, what documentation is necessary, and the costs involved—is key to planning a smooth transition. Business Regulations If your primary goal is to reside in a jurisdiction that is less likely to honour US legal requests, business regulations can be an important factor. In some countries, the regulatory environment is designed to be friendly to foreign business investors, while others implement strict background checks and enforce banking compliance through global standards. A country’s approach to business operations can indirectly affect how it handles legal and extradition matters, so it is worth paying close attention to local rules when considering investment options. Tax Considerations Many potential investors are attracted to nations with favourable tax regimes for foreign residents. Attractive tax policies can simplify the financial transition and enhance overall quality of life. However, the absence of an extradition treaty does not automatically imply that tax laws will be advantageous. Prospective residents must evaluate both the local tax environment and any existing obligations under international financial regulations. Engaging with a local tax expert to understand the complete picture is crucial. The Importance of Professional Guidance Given the unpredictable nature of diplomatic relations and constantly evolving local laws, obtaining reliable legal and financial counsel is an indispensable part of this process. Those seeking a second passport or legal residence should work with professionals who specialize in international law and investment immigration. Such expertise not only clarifies the current status of a country’s extradition policies but also helps identify any hidden risks associated with the legal, financial, and tax aspects of the investment route. Common Misconceptions About Non-Extradition Countries When it comes to countries without formal extradition treaties with the United States, several myths circulate that can cloud judgment and lead to misunderstandings. Here are some of the most common misconceptions—expanded and explained for clarity: Assuming Guaranteed Immunity Many believe that without a formal extradition treaty, an individual is completely insulated from any legal reach by US authorities. However, even in the absence of an extradition agreement, governments can respond to international pressure, collaborate via alternative legal frameworks, or act on local immigration laws. This means that activities such as visa violations, immigration offences, or other legal infractions can still result in detention, deportation, or other actions that affect one’s freedom. Thinking It Is an Easy Procedure A common misconception is that relocating to a non-extradition country and obtaining citizenship is a straightforward process. In reality, pursuing a second citizenship involves considerable time, financial commitment, and thorough knowledge of local legal requirements. Citizenship by investment programs, for example, often demands significant capital investments and is accompanied by extensive background checks. Understanding the complexities of local laws and adhering to procedural requirements is crucial to a successful application. Believing Hiding Is Always Possible It is sometimes assumed that acquiring citizenship in a country without an extradition treaty means one can effortlessly avoid detection by international law enforcement. However, modern technology and global data-sharing networks make it increasingly difficult to elude authorities. International systems, like Interpol’s Red Notices and other cooperative mechanisms, ensure that even individuals in non-extradition countries can come under scrutiny if serious crimes are involved. Presuming Laws Never Change Another dangerous myth is the belief that the legal landscape in non-extradition countries is static. National laws, treaties, and international agreements are subject to continuous evolution. Countries may sign new treaties, amend immigration policies, or introduce stricter legal measures that alter the current framework. Relying on outdated information can lead to a false sense of security, making it imperative to stay informed with up-to-date and reliable legal insights. Overlooking the Impact of Bilateral Relationships Some individuals erroneously assume that a lack of an extradition treaty automatically means a country operates in complete isolation from US legal influence. In practice, many nations maintain active bilateral relationships and may engage in cooperative measures such as mutual legal assistance, even if a formal extradition agreement is absent. These alternative channels of cooperation can be invoked in cases involving serious crimes, blurring the line between perceived and actual legal protection. Underestimating the Role of Local Enforcement A further misconception is that local enforcement agencies in non-extradition countries will always act independently of international influences. While local authorities often operate within a distinct legal framework, they are not entirely immune to external requests or pressure, especially if criminal cases carry significant domestic or international attention. This means that relying solely on the absence of an extradition treaty can be misleading when facing complex legal challenges. Believing Citizenship Is a Foolproof Shield Lastly, there is a tendency to view second citizenship acquired in non-extradition countries as an absolute safeguard against any future legal or financial consequences in other jurisdictions. In practice, citizenship merely provides an additional layer of legal residency or travel freedom; it does not erase responsibilities or past actions. Serious offences may still result in international legal actions regardless of one’s citizenship status. Staying informed with accurate data and consulting trusted sources like official government announcements, international news outlets, and reputable legal experts can help dispel these myths and equip individuals with a more realistic understanding of their rights and limitations. This awareness is essential for making informed decisions and ensuring that any steps taken are grounded in current, reliable information. How to Legally Obtain Citizenship in Non-Extradition Countries Each jurisdiction applies its own rules and criteria for acquiring citizenship. While the specific pathways differ from one country to another, several recurring elements tend to emerge for those seeking a second passport in jurisdictions known for their non-extradition stance. Application Process In every country, the application process starts with thorough paperwork. Applicants must fill out detailed forms and submit a variety of official documents that validate their identity and background. For example, citizenship by investment programs may require demonstrable proof of financial resources, business ownership, or significant investment in local ventures. In some nations, applicants can initially secure residency status, which over time leads to naturalization. In all cases, following the prescribed procedures and ensuring that every requirement is met plays a crucial role in a successful application. Documentation Requirements Documentation is key to any successful citizenship application. Applicants typically need to provide comprehensive records, such as background checks, bank statements that show financial stability, certified copies of birth certificates, and medical records. In several jurisdictions, authorities may request professional references or endorsements, which serve to further confirm the applicant’s standing. Maintaining meticulous records and preparing for additional documentation requests can help streamline the process. Timeline and Costs The timeframe for obtaining citizenship varies significantly across different jurisdictions. Some programs offer expedited routes that conclude in a matter of months, while others might take several years, particularly when the path to citizenship requires an initial residency period followed by naturalization. Costs are just as variable, ranging from moderate administrative fees to considerable financial investments in exchange for citizenship. Prospective applicants should carefully assess both the timeline, and the economic commitments involved to ensure that the process aligns with their personal and financial goals. A well-researched and methodically executed plan is essential for anyone considering a transition to a non-extradition country. Staying informed about the current legal environment, including US extradition policies and any changes in local legislative frameworks, is vital. Even if a jurisdiction appears on a non-extradition list today, evolving political or legal circumstances could affect its status in the future. At Savory and Partners, we provide legal and professional guidance through every stage of the citizenship application process. Our team of experts helps you navigate the complexities of local policies and investment requirements, ensuring that your application is solidly prepared and aligned with current legal standards. By combining our in-depth knowledge of international law with ongoing monitoring of policy changes, we empower you to make informed decisions for a smoother transition to your new citizenship. Key Takeaways on Non-Extradition Countries: What You Need to Know Choosing a country without extradition requires serious reflection. Rules change quickly in international affairs, and even a non-extradition treaty nation can shift alliances. Official processes often exist for deportation, which can sidestep the need for a formal treaty. The best approach is thorough research coupled with professional advice from lawyers who specialize in international law. Remaining informed is the safest method to avoid mistakes that lead to serious legal consequences. (Disclaimer: This article is for general educational purposes. It does not replace legal advice. Anyone seeking guidance about specific situations should consult qualified legal professionals.) FAQs About Non-Extradition Countries What exactly is a non-extradition country? A non-extradition country is one that either does not have a formal extradition treaty with the United States or has legal frameworks that prevent automatic extradition of its citizens or residents. This means that, although some legal cooperation may occur through alternative channels like mutual legal assistance or deportation laws, there is no standing, treaty-based obligation to surrender individuals to US authorities. Does having citizenship in a non-extradition country provide complete legal protection against US law enforcement? No, possessing second citizenship in a non-extradition country does not offer absolute immunity. Even without an extradition treaty, governments may still act on requests via other legal mechanisms, such as deportation in cases of immigration or local law violations. Moreover, serious criminal charges or international cooperation efforts (like Interpol Red Notices) can result in legal action regardless of one’s citizenship status. What are the typical pathways to obtaining citizenship in these countries? There are generally two pathways: Citizenship by Investment Programs: These involve direct financial contributions or real estate investments, along with a streamlined application process. Residency to Naturalization: Some countries require an initial period of legal residence with subsequent naturalization. Both routes demand strict adherence to application procedures, thorough documentation, and, in many cases, substantial financial commitments. How do changes in international and local laws affect non-extradition status? The legal landscape is constantly evolving. Countries might sign new extradition agreements, amend their immigration policies, or adjust their stance on international legal cooperation based on shifting geopolitical, economic, or security concerns. Therefore, even if a country appears on a non-extradition list now, its status can change. Continuous monitoring of legal developments and regular consultations with legal experts are essential. Why is professional legal guidance important when considering a move to a non-extradition country? Due to the complexity and rapid evolution of both international extradition treaties and local legal frameworks, expert advice ensures that you have the most current and relevant information. Professional legal guidance can help clarify your options, outline risks, and assist with the meticulous preparation required for successful citizenship or residency applications. Organizations like Savory and Partners provide such assistance, helping you navigate each step of the process with confidence. References Organization of American States. (n.d.). American Convention on Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.oas.org/dil/treaties_b-32_american_convention_on_human_rights.htm U.S. Department of Justice. (n.d.). List of Participating Countries/Governments. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-oia/list-participating-countriesgovernments Interpol. (n.d.). Red Notices. Retrieved from https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Notices/View-Red-Notices U.S. Department of State. (n.d.). International Security and Global Issues: Extradition. Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/international-security/ World Bank. (n.d.). Legal Systems and International Cooperation. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/governance/overview

Latest Articles

All

Visa Free Access

European Residency

Citizenship

Business Migration

Life Abroad

Real Estate

Savory and Partners

PORTUGAL | RESIDENCY BY INVESTMENT

READY TO APPLY?

Citizenship enquiry

Citizenship enquiry

© 2024 Second Citizenship by Investment, Second Passport Programs - Savory & Partners. Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions